Freo's View


Posted in city of fremantle, freight, noise, state government, traffic, trains, transport, Uncategorized by freoview on September 6, 2019


Planning Minister Rita Saffioti today released the revised State Planning Policy 5.4 road and rail noise, which aims to balance the needs of transport corridors with protecting the community from unreasonable amounts of noise.

The new policy will help develop better land use and development outcomes around major transport corridors, including METRONET and the McGowan Government’s social and affordable housing package that will be built around station precincts.

  • Revised State Planning Policy 5.4 on road and rail noise released following public consultation
  • Updated policy aims to balance the needs of transport corridors while protecting the community from unreasonable noise
  • Will broadly apply to new residential developments within 300 metres of a transit corridor
  • New guidelines will support delivery of major McGowan Government election commitments including METRONET

The review was overseen by the Western Australian Planning Commission and involved an extensive public consultation period, with 62 stakeholder submissions received.

The new policy balances the community’s need for amenity and quiet while also recognising the need for important freight and transit corridors.

It aims to ensure noise impacts are addressed as early as possible in the planning process and encourages best practice around noise mitigation design and construction standards.

The updated policy will apply broadly to new residential developments proposed within 300 metres of a specified transport corridor and to new or major upgrades of roads and railways.

In addition to simplifying the assessment and implementation process, the policy and associated guidelines will:

  • Provide guidance on ‘quiet house’ design requirements such as building orientation, window glazing and insulation;
  • Introduce mapping and trigger distances that demonstrate areas to which the policy applies;
  • Prioritise strategic freight routes and ensure noise mitigation measures are suitable for the function of the route and the proposed or current land use; and
  • Provide better guidance on the content and form of noise management plans.

For more information, visit


Roel Loopers




One of only two agenda items for the Strategic Planning and Transport Committee on Wednesday will be the community consultation paper put out by the WA Planning Commission-WAPC about noise in entertainment areas such as Northbridge, and the question if Fremantle Council should consider asking the WAPC to include the Fremantle CBD in the trial.

Medium and high density urban infill has seen a rise in complaints in recent years from residents who are not happy with the noise from entertainment venues and transport, but the entertainment industry believes it is not fair that the onus should only be on them and that it should be shared with developers of new residential buildings, which should be required to put better noise insulation measures, such as double glazing and thicker glass in their developments.

I remember many years ago that when the new apartments opposite Clancy’s were built that it only took one week before the first complaint was made about live music there, although the tavern had been having regular live concerts for many many years.

In Fremantle where we are going to see a glut of new residential apartments and hotel rooms, combined with new taverns and bars, it is essential to also protect the livelihood of the hospitality industry and demand new buildings that have better noise protection for their users.

Roel Loopers


Posted in fremantle, local government, noise by freoview on June 23, 2015

Calls by Cottesloe Councillors to ban rooftop gardens because of the noise from parties held there raise an interesting question about how much inner city residents should have to put up with. Some say if you want to live in a vibrant inner city you’ll have to live with the noise of parties, pubs, music venues, cars, drunks, etc. and if you don’t like it move to the suburbs, but is that fair?

Even people living in a bustling inner city do have the right to privacy and the comfort of their own home, and the argument that one can’t expect to have quiet days and nights because of an inner city location are inconsiderate, especially since real estate in a central location like Fremantle costs a lot more that in the outer suburbs.

With our climate and our lifestyle we are blessed to be able to entertain outdoors for eight months a year and that requires consideration for our neighbours who might not party as often. Is live music acceptable at an inner city party for example, or why should Marine Parade residents accept that the City of Fremantle has made the Esplanade Reserve park into a showground, when the Town of Claremont no longer allows live concerts at their showground?

There is a fine line between freedom and making a nuisance of oneself. The lack of care and consideration for others is often the core problem. If everyone in our street had two loud and late parties over the warmer months we would not have a quiet weekend ever where we can just sit outdoors and have a nice chat and a barbeque, because the noise from others would intrude and take away our privacy and preferred way of living and entertaining.

One Cottesloe Councillor said the noise from roof garden parties descents on the suburb like a cloud from which no one can escape. I recall similar complaints were made when Many 6160 had a rooftop bar and live music.

There is a difference when people buy property and move in near a source of noise, be that a train line, busy road or pub. When they do that they should be aware that they will get noise, but others who have bought in a relatively quiet location should not suddenly have to put up with extreme noise. The planned live music venue at J Shed for example will seriously affect the lifestyle and quiet comfort of those who years ago bought properties in the west end of Fremantle. Is that fair to them and should they have to accept that because the common good is more important than their privacy? Would you accept it if it happened near you?

Rooftop gardens are the new design features of many multi-storey apartment buildings and that requires that Councils have laws in place to deal with the noise that might escape from them and affect neighbours close and far away. The Fremantle inner city is already going through a change with apartment buildings in progress and others planned, so we’d better get ready and deal with the coming changes and challenges related to it.

Roel Loopers

%d bloggers like this: