Freo's View

CAN WALYALUP CENTRE MOVE BE SUCCESSFUL?

Posted in aboriginal, city of fremantle, culture, indigenous, local government by freoview on February 23, 2017

The lease of the DADAA premises at Beach Street opposite the East Street jetty was on the Fremantle Council agenda on Wednesday.

DADAA is moving into the former Boys School at Princess May Park and the officers wanted an Expressions of Interest period to find out which community groups are interested in leasing the building.

Speakers from arts, disability and the RSL expressed an interest in moving into the building, but a motion by Councillor Pemberton that there should be a three-months period to see if the building would be better suited for the Walyalup Aboriginal Cultural Centre than the present one at Arthur’s Head did get support from her fellow Councillors.

I do agree with Pemberton’s sentiment that Noongar people who are still suffering from multi-generational trauma deserve and need support to lift them to a same level playing field as other community groups. However that support was already there and the City invested $ 200,000 a year for two years in the Walyalup centre at Mrs Trivett Lane that got very little support from the Noongar community and basically failed to make any impact at all.

It was clear from the beginning that it would be very hard to make it successful because of family feuding in the Noongar community. The manager of the centre told me he had even considered a roster so certain families could use the centre on some days, and some on other days, because they would not be willing to share the space on the same days.

We know that there is constant disagreement who is allowed to speak or not for certain parts of the Perth metro region with some families claiming to be the only descendants of Yagan while other families claim they are also direct descendants of the great Noongar warrior.

This will affect the success of the Walyalup centre no matter if it is at Arthur’ Head or near Cantonment Hill. An EOI period to find an Aboriginal group to manage the existing Walyalup centre has failed so far and it is unlikely that the City will be able to find a Noongar group willing to pay the $ 16,000.00 rent per annum for leasing the Beach Street building.

My concern is that we will have a period where other community groups will be excluded from bidding for the DADAA building at Beach Street while the City is engaging with Noongar elders about the prospect of them running an autonomous cultural community centre.

We know from past experience that this will be a long drawn-out process that no doubt will require money to pay consultants and those attending meetings with no guarantee whatsoever that there will be a positive outcome and good community use for the Beach Street building.

In the meantime the Arthur Head Aboriginal cultural centre will remain a flop and closed most days and won’t be put back for Expressions of Interest, although Arts on the Move, who expressed interest in the DADAA building, appears to be a perfect tenant for the Bathers Beach Art Precinct building.

It is imperative that the City of Fremantle does not allow the Noongar consultation to go further than three months as it would hold back the opportunity for other groups to move in, in case Noongar elders can’t come to an agreement on who and how to run the Walyalup centre in the new location.

While I deeply respect Aboriginal culture the City needs to be realistic about the fact that the DADAA building can’t be allowed to be vacant for too long as that will attract anti social behaviour and homeless people to the building, and the same applies to the Walyalup Centre at Arthur’s Head.

What also should be considered is if a city centre location is really the best for a Noongar community centre as not many Aboriginal people live in the CBD. Maybe a building in the Hilton/White Gum Valley area would be more appropriate if the centre is not meant to be a cultural centre for overseas and Wadjela visitors.

The Noongar community will need to make a few good decisions fast if they are genuinely interested in managing a community centre. Kaya!

Roel Loopers

3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Rachel said, on February 23, 2017 at 4:35 pm

    hi Roel,
    I’ve drafted a few of my own thoughts on the topic here
    http://www.rachelpemberton.com.au/culturally-sensitive-approach-to-cultural-centre-needed/

    I hope it helps shed a little light.

    I do agree with Rob’s comments above – Boo Park would also be ideal, but how long would we need to wait to have the funds to build something suitable?

    Anyhow, I hope we can spare a bit of time to see if the comity can embrace the next step – whatever it might be.

  2. Suzanne said, on February 23, 2017 at 12:20 pm

    Entirely correct Roel.

    Different location?
    You can change the chairs on the Titanic but it still goes down.

    I also heard the excellent expressions of interest from a variety of needy community groups.
    Its time one of them got a turn of our financial ‘largess’.

  3. Rob Fittock said, on February 23, 2017 at 7:41 am

    During my time on Council I attended numerous meetings with Elders to discuss what they would like to see in a Cultural Centre and the outcome was what we have today as at the time CoF had no other alternative for a location….but it did

    What was very clear to me was that the Elders were looking for a plot of land within the Fremantle area that could be developed to suit their needs as a meeting place to be able to conduct their traditional ceremonies and provide guidance, teaching and help to people….a place to call home that would be open to visitors, dignitaries et al to visit and enjoy their culture, foods and hospitality

    Boo Park was discussed as a possible site but unfortunately could not find legs at the time, however, it should be revisited to explore more rigorously the options that are available for securing a grant/s to build a new premises

    I also believed at the time that the group should be autonomous with support from CoF, or in other words the ratepayers, and I still believe that and I hope that serious consideration is given to this option in future talks with the Eldership

    Rob


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: